AMP › 2024 (2) › Tournament of 4 Jun 2026

Tournament ranking

Mitchell, 6 tables

Overall ranking

Rank	No.	Team	Deals	%	IMP	VP
1	7	Richard Anne	20	65.00 %	+44.25	11.00
2	2	Olivier Danielle	20	63.75 %	+23.75	10.00
3	9	Patrice Tato	20	62.50 %	+16.50	9.00
4	3	Dominique Sophie	20	58.13 %	+42.50	8.00
5	4	Jean-Claude Anne	20	55.63 %	+13.00	7.00
6	5	Séverine-Fanette	20	48.13 %	-9.50	6.00
7	12	Gilles Hélène	20	46.25 %	-8.75	4.50
8	11	Heather Gisi	20	46.25 %	-11.75	4.50
9	8	Catherine Agnès	20	44.38 %	-4.25	3.00
10	1	Dominique Isabelle	20	41.25 %	-37.00	2.00
11	10	Tanguy Laure	20	35.63 %	-36.00	1.00
12	6	Arnaud Elisabeth	20	33.13 %	-32.75	0.00

North-South

Rank	No.	Team	Deals	%	IMP
1	2	Olivier Danielle	20	63.75 %	+23.75
2	3	Dominique Sophie	20	58.13 %	+42.50
3	4	Jean-Claude Anne	20	55.63 %	+13.00
4	5	Séverine-Fanette	20	48.13 %	-9.50
5	1	Dominique Isabelle	20	41.25 %	-37.00
6	6	Arnaud Elisabeth	20	33.13 %	-32.75

East-West

Rank	No.	Team	Deals	%	IMP
1	7	Richard Anne	20	65.00 %	+44.25
2	9	Patrice Tato	20	62.50 %	+16.50
3	12	Gilles Hélène	20	46.25 %	-8.75
4	11	Heather Gisi	20	46.25 %	-11.75
5	8	Catherine Agnès	20	44.38 %	-4.25
6	10	Tanguy Laure	20	35.63 %	-36.00

Click the “%” or “IMP” header to change the ranking criterion.

Percentage: average of the percentages scored on the boards played (2 points per table beaten, 1 per tie). IMP: total of the IMPs scored against the other tables. Only recorded boards count.

VP: victory points awarded for the championship from the overall tournament ranking. Calculation: Rank by percentage (number of teams minus rank).

Back to the tournament