Duplibridge

Saint Martin › Tournoi 2023 › Tournament of 29 Jan 2023

Tournament ranking

Mitchell, 9 tables

Printable version

Overall ranking

Rank No. Team Deals % IMP VP
1= 19 Chevalier E 21 58.33 % +23.83 33.50
1= 28 Marinot J 21 58.33 % +23.83 33.50
3= 24 Unguran D 21 58.33 % +12.66 33.50
3= 33 Unguran M-F 21 58.33 % +12.66 33.50
5= 6 Guerithault C. 21 57.94 % +9.67 30.50
5= 15 Guerithault M. 21 57.94 % +9.67 30.50
7= 4 Petit G. 21 57.54 % +42.82 28.50
7= 13 Petit Gis. 21 57.54 % +42.82 28.50
9= 7 Vidal M. 21 54.37 % +24.35 26.50
9= 16 Vidal 21 54.37 % +24.35 26.50
11= 26 Collignon P. 21 51.59 % +23.01 24.50
11= 35 Collignon B. 21 51.59 % +23.01 24.50
13= 23 Pascal F. 21 50.79 % +5.99 21.50
13= 32 Pascal Mme 21 50.79 % +5.99 21.50
15= 3 D'illiers C. 21 50.79 % -9.49 21.50
15= 12 D'illiers H. 21 50.79 % -9.49 21.50
17= 21 Hours S. 21 49.21 % -9.84 18.50
17= 30 Saulnier M 21 49.21 % -9.84 18.50
19= 22 Sarrau F 21 48.81 % +0.35 15.50
19= 31 Laguarigue B. 21 48.81 % +0.35 15.50
21= 25 Phalippou H 21 48.81 % -7.83 15.50
21= 34 Phalippou J. 21 48.81 % -7.83 15.50
23= 1 Mercier D. 21 48.02 % -9.52 12.50
23= 10 Cas 21 48.02 % -9.52 12.50
25= 5 Mir Mme 21 46.43 % -18.00 10.50
25= 14 Meyer C. 21 46.43 % -18.00 10.50
27= 2 Tatton-brown G. 21 46.03 % -18.67 8.50
27= 11 Tatton-brown 21 46.03 % -18.67 8.50
29= 8 Courtois M. 21 44.84 % -20.99 6.50
29= 17 Courtois R. 21 44.84 % -20.99 6.50
31= 9 Deries A. 21 44.05 % -0.16 4.50
31= 18 Deries 21 44.05 % -0.16 4.50
33= 20 Caron D. 21 42.86 % -31.01 2.50
33= 29 Caron R. 21 42.86 % -31.01 2.50
35= 27 Lacombe D. 21 41.27 % -17.17 0.50
35= 36 Lacombe H. 21 41.27 % -17.17 0.50

North-South

Rank No. Team Deals % IMP
1= 6 Guerithault C. 21 57.94 % +9.67
1= 15 Guerithault M. 21 57.94 % +9.67
3= 4 Petit G. 21 57.54 % +42.82
3= 13 Petit Gis. 21 57.54 % +42.82
5= 7 Vidal M. 21 54.37 % +24.35
5= 16 Vidal 21 54.37 % +24.35
7= 3 D'illiers C. 21 50.79 % -9.49
7= 12 D'illiers H. 21 50.79 % -9.49
9= 1 Mercier D. 21 48.02 % -9.52
9= 10 Cas 21 48.02 % -9.52
11= 5 Mir Mme 21 46.43 % -18.00
11= 14 Meyer C. 21 46.43 % -18.00
13= 2 Tatton-brown G. 21 46.03 % -18.67
13= 11 Tatton-brown 21 46.03 % -18.67
15= 8 Courtois M. 21 44.84 % -20.99
15= 17 Courtois R. 21 44.84 % -20.99
17= 9 Deries A. 21 44.05 % -0.16
17= 18 Deries 21 44.05 % -0.16

East-West

Rank No. Team Deals % IMP
1= 19 Chevalier E 21 58.33 % +23.83
1= 28 Marinot J 21 58.33 % +23.83
3= 24 Unguran D 21 58.33 % +12.66
3= 33 Unguran M-F 21 58.33 % +12.66
5= 26 Collignon P. 21 51.59 % +23.01
5= 35 Collignon B. 21 51.59 % +23.01
7= 23 Pascal F. 21 50.79 % +5.99
7= 32 Pascal Mme 21 50.79 % +5.99
9= 21 Hours S. 21 49.21 % -9.84
9= 30 Saulnier M 21 49.21 % -9.84
11= 22 Sarrau F 21 48.81 % +0.35
11= 31 Laguarigue B. 21 48.81 % +0.35
13= 25 Phalippou H 21 48.81 % -7.83
13= 34 Phalippou J. 21 48.81 % -7.83
15= 20 Caron D. 21 42.86 % -31.01
15= 29 Caron R. 21 42.86 % -31.01
17= 27 Lacombe D. 21 41.27 % -17.17
17= 36 Lacombe H. 21 41.27 % -17.17

Click the “%” or “IMP” header to change the ranking criterion.

Percentage: average of the percentages scored on the boards played (2 points per table beaten, 1 per tie). IMP: total of the IMPs scored against the other tables. Only recorded boards count.

VP: victory points awarded for the championship from the overall tournament ranking. Calculation: Rank by percentage (number of teams minus rank).

Back to the tournament